Logo of A&M Canadian Immigration law Corporation

For U.S. Cases, How Does “Convicted” vs “Committed an Act” Affect Criminal Inadmissibility in Canadian Immigration Inside vs Outside Canada?

If you are a U.S. citizen, green card holder, or U.S. non-immigrant travelling to Canada, inadmissibility can be based on:

       a conviction, or

       committing an act outside Canada that would be an offence in Canada.
 Source: IRPA s. 36

Convictions in Canada

       Serious criminality: 10+ years maximum or >6 months imprisonment imposed.
 Source: IRPA s. 36(1)(a)

       Ordinary criminality (foreign nationals): indictable or two convictions (separate incidents).
 Source: IRPA s. 36(2)(a)

U.S. convictions (outside Canada)

       Serious criminality: Canadian equivalent with 10+ year maximum.
 Source: IRPA s. 36(1)(b)

       Ordinary criminality: Canadian equivalent indictable, or qualifying two convictions.
 Source: IRPA s. 36(2)(b)

“Committed an act” (outside Canada)

       Foreign nationals: act equates to indictable in Canada.
 Source: IRPA s. 36(2)(c)

       Serious criminality: act equates to 10+ year maximum offence in Canada.
 Source: IRPA s. 36(1)(c)

Common U.S. issue: IRCC warns impaired driving convictions may cause inadmissibility.
 Source: IRCC impaired driving  

If you have a U.S. record (conviction, charge, or pending matter), a document-based Canadian equivalency review can clarify whether IRPA s. 36 applies and what options may be available.
Source: IRPA s. 36 

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Potentially—through the “committing an act” provisions if the act is established and matches a Canadian offence.
    Yes—through the foreign conviction provisions and equivalency.

    Contact our office for details. Our immigration legal service in Winnipeg will assess your eligibility per CIC criteria and submit your application.