Logo of A&M Canadian Immigration law Corporation

Federal, Manitoba Provincial, and Youth Offences: What Counts for Criminal Inadmissibility in Canadian Immigration?

For criminal inadmissibility, Canadian immigration law focuses on IRPA s. 36. A key phrase in s. 36 is offences under an “Act of Parliament”—that generally means federal laws (like the Criminal Code), not provincial statutes. Source: IRPA s. 36

1) Federal offences (Act of Parliament): can trigger inadmissibility

Federal offences include crimes under the Criminal Code and other federal statutes. These can trigger inadmissibility under:

        Serious criminality (IRPA s. 36(1)), and/or

        Ordinary criminality (IRPA s. 36(2)),
 depending on the offence and thresholds.

Example (federal driving offence): Dangerous operation

        Criminal Code s. 320.13 is a federal offence (“dangerous operation”).

2) Manitoba provincial offences: generally do not trigger IRPA s. 36

Provincial offences are created under provincial statutes, not Acts of Parliament. A classic example is careless driving under Manitoba’s Highway Traffic Act.

Manitoba example: Careless driving (provincial)

        Manitoba Highway Traffic Act s. 188(2): “No person shall drive carelessly.”

        This is a provincial offence, so on its own it generally does not fall under IRPA s. 36(1) or 36(2) “Act of Parliament” conviction triggers.

Practical Manitoba scenario (why charge reductions can matter)

If someone is initially facing a federal Criminal Code driving allegation (e.g., dangerous operation under s. 320.13), but the matter is resolved as Manitoba HTA careless driving (s. 188), that resolution is typically treated differently for immigration purposes because it is provincial, not federal.

3) Youth offences and contraventions: specific exclusions in IRPA s. 36(3)(e)

Even when conduct relates to federal law, IRPA limits inadmissibility in certain situations. Under IRPA s. 36(3)(e), inadmissibility under s. 36(1) to (2.1) may not be based on:

        an offence designated as a contravention under the Contraventions Act;

        an offence where the person is found guilty under the former Young Offenders Act; or

        an offence for which the person received a youth sentence under the Youth Criminal Justice Act.

Call A&M Canadian Immigration Law Corporation: (204) 442-2786
 If your record includes a mix of Manitoba provincial offences, Criminal Code charges, or youth matters, a document-based review can confirm whether IRPA s. 36 applies and what options may be available.

Disclaimer (Educational Use Only)

This content is provided for general educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Immigration laws, regulations, policies, and officer practices can change, and outcomes depend on the facts and official records in each case.

Sources (hyperlinks)

        IRPA s. 36 (criminal inadmissibility; includes s. 36(3)(e))

        Manitoba Highway Traffic Act (C.C.S.M. c. H60) s. 188 (careless driving)

     Criminal Code s. 320.13 (dangerous operation)

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Usually not under IRPA s. 36, because it is a provincial statute (not an Act of Parliament).
    That is a federal offence and can trigger inadmissibility depending on the IRPA category and thresholds.
    Not always. IRPA has specific exclusions for Young Offenders Act findings and youth sentences under the YCJA in s. 36(3)(e).

    Visit our Social Media:

    CATEGORIES

    Send Us A Message

    Contact our office for details. Our immigration legal service in Winnipeg will assess your eligibility per CIC criteria and submit your application.