Logo of A&M Canadian Immigration law Corporation

For U.S. Cases, How Does “Convicted” vs “Committed an Act” Affect Criminal Inadmissibility in Canadian Immigration Inside vs Outside Canada?

If you are a U.S. citizen, green card holder, or U.S. non-immigrant travelling to Canada, inadmissibility can be based on:

       a conviction, or

       committing an act outside Canada that would be an offence in Canada.
 Source: IRPA s. 36

Convictions in Canada

       Serious criminality: 10+ years maximum or >6 months imprisonment imposed.
 Source: IRPA s. 36(1)(a)

       Ordinary criminality (foreign nationals): indictable or two convictions (separate incidents).
 Source: IRPA s. 36(2)(a)

U.S. convictions (outside Canada)

       Serious criminality: Canadian equivalent with 10+ year maximum.
 Source: IRPA s. 36(1)(b)

       Ordinary criminality: Canadian equivalent indictable, or qualifying two convictions.
 Source: IRPA s. 36(2)(b)

“Committed an act” (outside Canada)

       Foreign nationals: act equates to indictable in Canada.
 Source: IRPA s. 36(2)(c)

       Serious criminality: act equates to 10+ year maximum offence in Canada.
 Source: IRPA s. 36(1)(c)

Common U.S. issue: IRCC warns impaired driving convictions may cause inadmissibility.
 Source: IRCC impaired driving  

If you have a U.S. record (conviction, charge, or pending matter), a document-based Canadian equivalency review can clarify whether IRPA s. 36 applies and what options may be available.
Source: IRPA s. 36 

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Potentially—through the “committing an act” provisions if the act is established and matches a Canadian offence.
    Yes—through the foreign conviction provisions and equivalency.

    Visit our Social Media:

    CATEGORIES

    Send Us A Message

    Contact our office for details. Our immigration legal service in Winnipeg will assess your eligibility per CIC criteria and submit your application.