| August - 2019 | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Sr. no. | Case Name | Topic | Decision |
| 1 | Aghaalikhani v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1080 | Study Permit Refusal Set Aside for Ignoring Strong Home Ties and Study Purpose Evidence | Successful |
| 2 | Tabari v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1046 | Study Permit Refusal Upheld for Weak Establishment, Family Ties and Unclear Study Plan | Unsuccessful |
| 3 | Douglas v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1101 | Temporary Resident Permit Refusal Set Aside for Failing to Assess Family Circumstances and BIOC | Successful |
| 4 | Tran v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1035 | Family Class Sponsorship Refusal Upheld for Non-Genuine Marriage and Immigration Purpose | Unsuccessful |
| 5 | Basanti v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1068 | Family Class Sponsorship Refusal Upheld Where Marriage Was Primarily for Immigration Purposes | Unsuccessful |
| 6 | Flambert v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1078 | H&C Refusal Set Aside for Flawed Establishment, Country Hardship and BIOC Analysis | Successful |
| 7 | Hassan v. Canada (Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship), 2019 FC 1096 | Provincial Nominee PR Refusal Set Aside for Failing to Respect PEI Nomination Presumption | Successful |
| 8 | Sun v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1069 | Self-Employed Permanent Residence Refusal Upheld for Weak Business Plan and Limited Language Ability | Unsuccessful |
| 9 | Marcusa v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2019 FC 1092 | Exclusion Order Upheld for Attempting to Reside Permanently in Canada Without Required Status | Unsuccessful |
| 10 | S. R. v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2019 FC 1118 | Security Inadmissibility Finding Set Aside for Failing to Link Online Threats to National Security | Successful |
| 11 | Ylanan v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2019 FC 1063 | Removal Appeal Refusal Upheld Where Extensive Marriage Fraud Outweighed H&C Factors and Best Interests of the Children | Unsuccessful |
| 12 | Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) v. Yu, 2019 FC 1088 | Misrepresentation Removal Appeal Relief Upheld Based on H&C Factors and Best Interests of the Children | Unsuccessful for the Minister |
Prepared by:
Dr. Muhammad Abrar (Barrister and Solicitor)
Author | Writer | Mentor | Legal Researcher | Canadian Immigration Case Law and Statistics Analyst
