The Federal Court reviewed the refusal of a permanent
residence application under the Self-Employed Persons Class in the cultural
activities category.
The applicant was a wealthy Chinese businessman with
extensive experience in film, television, publishing, and cultural industries.
Although he had qualifying past experience, the officer was not satisfied that
he had demonstrated a sufficiently concrete plan, ability, or genuine intention
to establish himself as a self-employed film and television producer in Canada.
The Court upheld the refusal, emphasizing that past
experience alone does not establish that an applicant will actually carry out a
proposed self-employed activity in Canada.
Key Principle
To qualify as a self-employed person, an applicant must
establish more than relevant past experience.
The applicant must also demonstrate both the intention
and ability to be self-employed in Canada and to make a significant
contribution to the specified economic activity.
Where the proposed venture is future-oriented, an officer
may reasonably expect concrete evidence of preparation, research, planning, and
prior commitment showing that the applicant is likely to proceed with the
venture after obtaining permanent residence.
Background
The applicant had an estimated net worth of approximately
CAD $20 million and significant experience purchasing and selling television
dramas and films, as well as working as a producer, publisher, and director.
He proposed establishing a Vancouver company involved in
film and television production and cultural communication between Canada and
China.
During an interview, however, he was unable to provide
detailed information concerning production costs, wages, potential clients,
Canadian competition, work permits for foreign crew, marketing strategies, or
the practical steps required to operate the proposed Canadian venture.
He also indicated that he would rely substantially on
friends and liaison companies to carry out important aspects of the business.
Court Findings
The Court found ample evidence supporting the officer’s
concerns.
The applicant’s proposed television project remained at an
early planning stage. He could not explain important operational details, had
not identified prospective Canadian clients, had not undertaken substantial
market research, and had not demonstrated meaningful participation in earlier
Canadian productions.
The Court rejected the applicant’s challenge to the accuracy
of the officer’s interview notes. The notes were detailed and contemporaneous,
while the applicant produced little objective evidence contradicting them.
The Court placed particular emphasis on the concepts of ability and intention.
For a complex venture such as producing a 30-episode
television series, ability required evidence showing how the project would
actually be executed, including planning, personnel, production, financing,
marketing, and Canadian participation.
Intention similarly required more than statements about
future plans. Because permanent residence would be granted before the proposed
project was completed, the applicant needed to show meaningful prior steps and
commitments demonstrating that the venture was likely to proceed.
The Court also upheld the officer’s consideration of the
applicant’s inability to speak either official language as one factor in
assessing his ability to successfully implement a complicated cultural business
in Canada.
Outcome
The Federal Court dismissed the application for judicial
review, finding that the officer reasonably concluded that the applicant
had not demonstrated the required intention and ability to establish himself as
a self-employed person making a significant cultural contribution in Canada.
Case
Citation:
Wei v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 982 CanLII
Prepared by:
Dr. Muhammad
Abrar (Barrister and
Solicitor)
Author | Writer | Mentor | Legal Researcher | Canadian
Immigration Case Law and Statistics Analyst





