| January - 2019 | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Sr. no. | Case Name | Topic | Decision |
| 1 | Gopalan v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 109 | Visitor Visa – Misrepresentation Finding Set Aside Where Officer Relied on Unauthorized Representative’s Form | Successful |
| 2 | Adom v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 26 | Study Permit – Refusal Set Aside Where Officer Ignored Study Plan and Improperly Treated Lack of Travel History Negatively | Successful |
| 3 | Kwan v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 92 | Start-Up Visa Refusal Upheld Where Applicant Failed to Show Genuine and Active Business Involvement | Unsuccessful |
| 4 | Song v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 72 | Permanent Residence Refusal for Misrepresentation Set Aside Where Officer Failed to Explain Why Incorrect Employer Name Was Material | Successful |
| 5 | Hu v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 CanLII 42276 (CA IRB) | Permanent Resident Residency Obligation Appeal Allowed Despite Zero Days in Canada Due to Compelling H&C Factors | Successful |
| 6 | Urdas v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 131 | Permanent Residence – Live-in Caregiver Application Refused Due to Spouse’s Serious Criminality Inadmissibility for Alleged Attempted Murder | Unsuccessful |
| 7 | Yang v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 130 | Permanent Residence – Start-Up Visa Refusal Upheld for Insufficient Evidence of Genuine Business Involvement | Unsuccessful |
| 8 | Skinner v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 3 | H&C Refusal Set Aside for Unreasonable Assessment of Child’s Best Interests and Psychological Harm on Return to South Africa | Successful |
| 9 | Aguirre Renteria v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 134 | H&C Refusal Set Aside for Inadequate Analysis of Afro-Colombian Discrimination and Canadian Establishment | Successful |
| 10 | Boukhanfra v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 4 | H&C Refusal Upheld Where Applicant Failed to Establish Sufficient Hardship, Best Interests of Children, or Strong Establishment in Canada | Unsuccessful |
| 12 | Yanchak v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 117 | H&C Refusal Set Aside Where Officer Applied an Overly Strict Hardship Test and Made Speculative Findings on Mental Health and Support | Successful |
| 13 | Ma v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 108 | H&C Refusal Set Aside for Unreasonable Assessment of Children’s Hukou Status and Best Interests in China | Successful |
| 14 | Anyaso v. Canada (Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship), 2019 | Stay of Removal Refused Where Prior Credibility Findings Undermined Claimed Risk of Persecution in Nigeria Based on Alleged Bisexuality | Unsuccessful |
| 15 | Pompey v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 42 | PRRA – Refusal Upheld Where Domestic Violence Evidence Did Not Establish a Continuing Risk on Return to St. Vincent | Unsuccessful |
| 16 | Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) v. Degheb, 2019 FC 44 | Citizenship – Minister’s Challenge Dismissed Where Physical Presence Was Reasonably Established | Unsuccessful |
Prepared by:
Dr. Muhammad
Abrar (Barrister and
Solicitor)
Author | Writer | Mentor | Legal Researcher | Canadian Immigration Case Law and
Statistics Analyst





