In A.A. v. Canada (Citizenship
and Immigration), 2025 FC 1811, the Federal Court dismissed an application
for mandamus brought by a Palestinian family living in Gaza who sought
to compel IRCC to process their Temporary Resident Visa (TRV) applications
within 15 days. Although the Court recognized the severe humanitarian
circumstances facing the family and accepted that they had a legitimate
expectation that their applications would be processed in a timely manner, it
held that mandamus could not issue because the Applicants had not
satisfied all conditions precedent under the Gaza Temporary Public Policy,
particularly the requirement to provide biometrics.
Key Principle
A mandamus applicant must
establish all elements of the Apotex test, including a clear right to
performance of the public duty and satisfaction of all conditions precedent. A
humanitarian crisis, even one involving an extreme risk to life, cannot by
itself permit the Court to rewrite or vary the requirements of a Ministerial
public policy. Where operational circumstances prevent an applicant from
satisfying a policy condition, the Court cannot simply dispense with that
condition through mandamus.
The Court also confirmed that
while applicants under the Gaza Policy had a legitimate expectation of timely
processing, that expectation arose only once the Policy’s conditions were
fulfilled.
Background
The Applicants were a family of
five living in Gaza under extremely difficult humanitarian conditions. Their
anchor relative submitted the required crisis webform in January 2024 and
received reference codes in March. TRV applications were submitted on April 3,
2024. IRCC subsequently initiated high-priority security screening, including
additional inquiries concerning the adult male Applicant’s employment and
social media accounts. No final decision had been rendered by the time of the
hearing in November 2025.
The Gaza Policy was established
under s. 25.2 of IRPA and facilitated TRVs for eligible Palestinian
nationals with qualifying Canadian relatives. Applicants were required to
satisfy specified conditions, including providing biometrics. Because the Rafah
crossing had closed, the Applicants could not leave Gaza to provide biometrics.
Court Findings
• Public duty and legitimate
expectation: The Court accepted that IRCC had a legal duty to process
applications made under the Policy, but there was no specific statutory
timeframe within which IRCC was required to complete them. Nevertheless, the
Applicants had a legitimate expectation that their applications would be dealt
with in a timely manner given the nature and purpose of the Policy.
• Biometrics as a condition
precedent: The Applicants had not provided biometrics, a clear Policy
requirement. Although the inability to provide them resulted from the Rafah
border closure and was entirely beyond their control, the Court held that this
prevented them from establishing a clear right to mandamus.
• Delay and security
screening: The Court found no unreasonable delay. Approximately 18 months
had elapsed, but security screening remained active, including high-priority
screening involving multiple government departments and foreign states. The
Court held that the circumstances justified the continued processing period.
• Section 12.8 of the IRPR: The Court noted that s. 12.8 may potentially exempt applicants from biometric
requirements where collection is impossible or impracticable. However, the
Applicants had not raised this issue with IRCC before coming to Court. The
Court encouraged them to raise it with IRCC.
Outcome
The Federal Court dismissed the
application for mandamus. The Court emphasized that it could not vary or
rewrite the Gaza Policy, even in light of the Applicants’ desperate
humanitarian circumstances. No question of general importance was certified and
there was no order as to costs.
Case
Citation:
A.A. v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2025 FC 1811 (CanLII)
Prepared by:
Dr. Muhammad
Abrar (Barrister and
Solicitor)
Author | Writer | Mentor | Legal Researcher | Canadian
Immigration Case Law and Statistics Analyst





