Logo of A&M Canadian Immigration law Corporation

Case Law Library : November 2025

November-2025
Sr. no.Case NameTopicDecision
1Singh Chahal v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2025 FC 1851Work Permit Refusal – Unreasonable Finding of Significant Family Ties in CanadaSuccessful
2Singh v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2025 FC 1852Work Permit Refusal – Insufficient Financial Evidence and ExperienceUnsuccessful
3Singh v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2025 FC 1834Work Permit Refusal – Application Failed Due to Unexplained ViolationsUnsuccessful
4Shabanpourfard v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2025 FC 1786Start-Up Visa Refusal – Business Seriousness and Primary Purpose Concerns Not AddressedUnsuccessful
5Singh v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2025 FC 1768Work Permit Refusal – Application Failed Due to Financing and Licensing ConcernsUnsuccessful
6Nguyen v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2025 FC 1894Work Permit Refusal – Misrepresentation Allegation Lacked Details for Meaningful ResponseSuccessful
7Akhter v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2025 FC 1800Express Entry PR Refusal – Arranged Employment Offer Did Not Meet CRS RequirementsUnsuccessful
8Brar v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2025 FC 1788Express Entry PR Refusal – Insufficient Proof of Required Work Experience DutiesUnsuccessful
9Singh v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2025 FC 1767Express Entry PR Refusal – Documents Inconsistencies Undermined Claimed Canadian Work ExperienceUnsuccessful
10Kaur v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2025 FC 1865HCPPP PR Refusal – Foreign Education Credential Did Not Meet Program RequirementsUnsuccessful
11Yuehong v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2025 FC 1837Federal Self-Employed PR Mandamus – Application Premature Due to Pending Principal Applicant DecisionUnsuccessful
12Gill v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2025 FC 1831Criminal Rehabilitation Refusal – Positive Rehabilitation Evidence Not AddressedSuccessful
13Wang v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2025 FC 1832QBC PR Application – Mandamus Refusal Justified Due to Processing Delay Cause by Large QuotaUnsuccessful
14Chang v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2025 FC 1799H&C Refusal – Grandchildren’s Best Interests Not Properly AssessedSuccessful
15Ndungu v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2025 FC 1889H&C Refusal –Employment and Children’s Interests Reasonably AssessedUnsuccessful
16Parmar v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2025 FC 1847H&C Refusal – Insufficient Evidence of Establishment, Grandchildren’s Interests, and HardshipUnsuccessful
17Singh v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2025 FC 1836H&C Refusal – Insufficient Evidence of Personalized Hardship, Establishment, and BIOCUnsuccessful
18Baig v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2025 FC 1769H&C Appeal – Rehabilitation Evidence and Children’s Best Interests Not Properly AssessedSuccessful
19Zubair v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2025 FC 1772TRV Refusal – Misrepresentation Finding Based Only on Altered Employment LetterSuccessful
20A.A. v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2025 FC 1811TRV Application – Mandamus Rejected Caused By Incompleted ScreeningUnsuccessful
21A.A. v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2025 FC 1812TRV Application – Mandamus Refused Due to Biometrics RequirementUnsuccessful
22A.B. v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2025 FC 1813TRV Application – Biometrics Requirement Prevented Timely Processing OrderUnsuccessful
23Asgari v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2025 FC 1790TRV Refusal – Family Ties, Financial Evidence, and Travel History Not Properly ConsideredSuccessful
24Zhang v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2025 FC 1785TRV Cancellation – Misrepresentation Finding Made Without Proper Notice or Chance to RespondSuccessful
25Issa v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2025 FC 1821TRV Refusal – Misrepresentation Finding Based on Incorrect Visa History AssessmentSuccessful
26Tanisha v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2025 FC 1828Restoration Refusal – Former Representative’s Failure to File Application Caused Loss of StatusSuccessful
27Kan v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2025 FC 1869Reconsideration Refusal – No New Grounds or Exceptional Circumstances EstablishedUnsuccessful
28Juárez Lopez v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2025 FC 1803Study Permit Refusal – Unclear Career Path and Study Progression ConcernsUnsuccessful
29Wu v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2025 FC 1880Spousal Sponsorship Refusal – Relationship Genuineness Not EstablishedUnsuccessful
30Hariendran v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2025 FC 1858Spousal Sponsorship Refusal – Inadmissibility Finding Based onLink With Unreasonable OrganizationSuccessful
31Lee v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2025 FC 1839Spousal Sponsorship Refusal – BIOC Analysis Unreasonably Failed to Assess Child’s CircumstancesSuccessful
32Maan v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2025 FC 1805Spousal Sponsorship Refusal – Marriage Genuineness Concerns Based on Living ArrangementsUnsuccessful



Prepared by: 
Dr. Muhammad Abrar (Barrister and Solicitor) 
Author | Writer | Mentor | Legal Researcher | Canadian Immigration Case Law and Statistics Analyst



Visit our Social Media:

CATEGORIES

Contact With US

From temporary status to PR, get expert legal help to choose the right immigration pathway.

Contact our office for details. Our immigration legal service in Winnipeg will assess your eligibility per CIC criteria and submit your application.