| August - 2026 | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Sr. no. | Case Name | Topic | Decision |
| 1 | Chhatrala v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2026 FC 1071 | Start-Up Visa Work Permit Refusal Upheld for Insufficient Evidence of Ability to Perform CEO Role | Unsuccessful |
| 2 | Punjwani v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2026 FC 1033 | Start-up Business Class: Refusal for an “Artificial Transaction” Under IRPR s. 89(b) Triggers Mandatory Refusals | Unsuccessful |
| 3 | Samadi v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2026 FC 1075 | Start-Up Visa Work Permit Refusal Upheld: No Genuine Offer of Employment and Insufficient Evidence of Significant Benefits | Unsuccessful |
| 4 | Sharif v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2026 FC 1039 | Start-Up Business Class: Refusal Upheld Where Evidence Did Not Show Active or Intended Business Operations in Canada | Unsuccessful |
| 5 | Mahallati v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2026 FC 1062 | TRV Refusal Unreasonable Where the Officer Fails to Explain Findings on Financial Sufficiency and Family Ties | Successful |
| 6 | Joshi v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2026 FC 1049 | CEC PR Application Refused After Officer Found Telecommunications Sales Work Was Retail Rather Than Wholesale | Successful |
| 7 | Nunes v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2026 FC 1051 | PR Card Refusal Is Unreasonable Where the Officer Ignores a Request to Reconsider a Prior Renunciation Decision | Successful |
| 8 | Razegh Panah Jahromi v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2026 FC 1041 | H&C Refusal: BIOC, Hardship in Iran, and a Limited Reference to the Super Visa | Unsuccessful |
| 9 | Bao v. Canada (Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship), 2026 FC 1029 | H&C Judicial Review: Officer May Give Little Weight Where Evidence of Medical Needs and Financial Inability Is Insufficient | Unsuccessful |
| 10 | Deen v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2026 FC 1059 | H&C Refusal Upheld Where Applicant Failed to Provide Evidence Supporting Establishment, Family Hardship and Best Interests of Children | Unsuccessful |
| 11 | Kaur v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2026 FC 1089 | H&C Refusal Set Aside Where Officer Mischaracterized the Purpose of H&C Relief and Relied on Undisclosed Country Conditions | Successful |
| 12 | Deen v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2026 FC 1059 | H&C Refusal Found Unreasonable Where Officer Minimized Extensive Medical Evidence | Successful |
| 13 | Nguri v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2026 FC 1085 | PRRA Reasonableness Review: Insufficient Evidence of Forward-Looking Personalized Risk | Unsuccessful |
| 14 | Kiss v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2026 FC 1056 | PRRA Decisions Must Address Key Evidence on Roma Applicants’ Alleged Police Targeting and Violence | Successful |
| 15 | Samiei v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2026 FC 1090 | Provincial Nominee (Non-Express Entry) Permanent Residence Application-Mandamus Granted for Unreasonable Delay in Deciding | Successful |
| 16 | Jin v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2026 FC 1080 | Mandamus Denied Where Ministerial Instructions and an Entity Suspension Justify Start-Up Visa Processing Delays | Unsuccessful |
| 17 | Samiei v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2026 FC 1090 | Mandamus for Study Permit Delay Dismissed Where Service Standards Are Not Proven and Security Screening Justifies Processing Time | Unsuccessful |
| 18 | Andriendo v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2026 FC 1054 | Mandamus Granted for Unreasonable Delay in Processing a Provincial Nominee Permanent Residence Application | Successful |
| 19 | Varasteh Nobari v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2026 FC 1092 | Work Permit Upheld Refusal Where Applicant Failed to Prove Language Proficiency Required by the LMIA | Unsuccessful |
| 20 | Kaur v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2026 FC 1095 | TRP Refusal Upheld Where Applicant Failed to Establish a Compelling Reason to Remain in Canada | Unsuccessful |
| 21 | Rahman v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2026 FC 1106 | Quebec Investor Class Applicants Must Provide Sufficient Evidence of a Genuine Intention to Reside in Quebec | Unsuccessful |
Prepared by:
Dr. Muhammad Abrar (Barrister and Solicitor)
Author | Writer | Mentor | Legal Researcher | Canadian Immigration Case Law and Statistics Analyst





