The Federal Court reviewed the refusal of a Saskatchewan
Provincial Nominee application.
Although Saskatchewan had nominated the applicant and
continued to support his application, the federal visa officer was not
satisfied that his English language ability was sufficient for him to become
economically established in Canada.
The Court upheld the refusal.
Key Principle
A provincial nomination is important evidence, but it is not
binding on the federal visa officer.
A federal officer may substitute their own assessment of an
applicant’s ability to become economically established, provided the required
consultation with the province and second-officer concurrence occur.
The officer may focus on the applicant’s intended occupation
when assessing economic establishment, particularly where the applicant has not
identified a realistic alternative occupation.
Background
The applicant was a Pakistani citizen with many years of
experience operating a computer hardware resale business.
He was nominated by Saskatchewan for the occupation of
Retail Trade Manager.
Although his IELTS results exceeded Saskatchewan’s minimum
general language requirements, the High Commission raised concerns that his
language ability might not be sufficient to perform the duties of a Retail
Trade Manager.
Saskatchewan maintained its support for the nomination, but
the visa officer remained unconvinced.
Court Findings
The Federal Court found that the officer had adequately
considered Saskatchewan’s position but was not required to accept it.
The officer reasonably concluded that general labour-market
conditions in Saskatchewan did not establish this particular applicant’s
ability to become economically established.
The Court also found that it was reasonable to assess the
applicant’s language ability against the demands of his intended occupation
because that was the occupation through which he proposed to establish himself.
An officer is not required to invent or assess hypothetical
alternative occupations where the applicant has not identified them.
The Court further noted that family support and settlement
funds had been considered but did not overcome the officer’s concern about the
applicant’s ability to obtain suitable employment. The claimed job offer also
had not been validated.
Outcome
The Federal Court dismissed the application for judicial
review.
The case confirms that meeting provincial minimum
requirements and receiving a provincial nomination do not guarantee permanent
residence where the federal officer reasonably concludes that the applicant has
not demonstrated an ability to become economically established in Canada.
Case Citation:
Chaudhry v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2015 FC 1072 CanLII
Prepared by:
Dr. Muhammad Abrar (Barrister and Solicitor)
Author | Writer | Mentor | Legal Researcher | Canadian Immigration Case Law and Statistics Analyst





