| Mandamus | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sr. no. | Case Name | Topic |
| 1 | Dai v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2026 FC 931 | Mandamus Granted Where Ministerial Instructions Create a Processing Policy Vacuum and Leave a Permanent Residence Application in Open-Ended Delay |
| 2 | Roghangar v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2026 FC 987 | Mandamus Granted Where Study Permit Application Was Delayed for Over Three Years Without Specific Evidence Justifying Security Screening |
| 3 | Conille v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 1998 CanLII 9097 (FCTTD) | Mandamus Granted Where Citizenship Application Was Unreasonably Delayed by an Indefinite CSIS Investigation |
| 4 | Donzo v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2025 FC 154 | Mandamus Granted Where Family-Class PR Application Was Delayed for Over 40 Months Without Adequate Justification |
| 5 | Fida v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2024 FC 720 | Mandamus Granted Where PR Application Remained Pending for Nearly Seven Years Without Adequate Security-Screening Justification |
| 6 | Ghalibaf v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 1408 | Mandamus Granted Where Security Screening Failed to Explain Over Four-Year Delay in Express Entry Application |
| 7 | Chen v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2026 FC 407 | Mandamus Refused Where Applicant Sought to Expedite PR Processing While Leave Application Was Pending |
| 8 | Ghaddar v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 946 | Mandamus Granted Where Permanent Residence Application Was Delayed for Nearly Six Years Without Adequate Justification |
| 9 | Manes v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2026 FC 80 | Mandamus Refused Where Applicant’s Failure to Provide Required Adoption Documents Contributed to Citizenship Processing Delay |
Prepared
by:
Dr. Muhammad Abrar (Barrister and Solicitor)
Author | Writer | Mentor | Legal Researcher | Canadian
Immigration Case Law and Statistics Analyst
